Choosing the Right AC-Input Power-Supply Topology
New European Union initiatives are driving the use of energy-saving
topologies in power supplies. Quasi-resonant, resonant
and soft-switching topologies are replacing the older hard-switching
topologies such as forward and flyback.
One common challenge is to decide which topology is optimal for a given
application. The following topologies will be considered: LLC resonant
topology, asymmetric half-bridge topology and quasi-resonant flyback
topology. Fairchild offers solutions for these designs starting from 1W all the
way up to 450W.

Fig. 1: Quasi-resonant converter for 30W-70W applications.
The quasi-resonant flyback topology has successfully been used in power
supplies up to 250W. It has been used in applications such as televisions
since the late 1990s. This topology requires one power MOSFET and one
wound component (the flyback transformer), so it is a low-cost technology.
At higher power levels, the large transformer size and correspondingly large
leakage inductance increase the power-supply size, cost and losses. Based
on these observations and comparing with the other topologies discussed, a
quasi-resonant converter can be used for power ratings up to 100W or
150W.
Fairchild Semiconductor’s FAN6300 quasi-resonant controller is ideal for
these higher power applications. For lower power applications, extra
integration can be achieved by combining the MOSFET and controller into
one package. An example is the FSQ series of FPS™ power switches, which
are suitable for power supplies from 1W to around 70W.
In the range of 100W to 500W, two different topologies come under
consideration. The output voltage is the determining factor governing which
will work best.
For output voltages below 24V, the asymmetric half-bridge topology is
recommended. Above this output level, the voltage rating of the output
diodes are much higher than with the LLC resonant converter, causing
unnecessary losses. If a synchronous output stage is used, the voltage rating
on the output MOSFETs would be high, resulting in extra system cost.
Fairchild Semiconductor’s FSFA2100 asymmetric half-bridge converter
contains the two MOSFETs and the controller required for the primary side of
such a converter. The efficiency of the 360W power supply in Fairchild
application note AN-4153 is more than 93%.

Fig. 2: Asymmetric half-bridge converter using FSFA2100.
For output voltages above 24V, and for power ratings in the region of 1kW,
the LLC resonant converter is a good choice. For output voltages below 24V,
the ripple-current rating on the output capacitor increases, resulting in extra
systemcost as a larger number of output capacitors, ormore expensive high ripple-current
devices, are needed tomeet the higher ripple current
requirement. Synchronous rectification, also, is not so simple in this topology.

Fig. 3: LLC resonant converter using FSFR2100.
Fairchild Semiconductor’s FSFR2100 LLC resonant converters contain the
two MOSFETs and the controller required for the primary side of an LLC
converter. The efficiency of this 450W PFC+LLC solution from Fairchild’s Global
Power ResourceSM centre is more than 90%. The efficiency of the 200W solution
is 93%. Efficiency levels of up to 95%-96% are possible when using
synchronous rectification. A new controller-only part is planned to support
designs up to 1kW.
Conclusion
As well as evaluating various topologies, in the past designers have also had to
overcome challenges such as ensuring stable operation, noise immunity, and
correct timing of resonant switching to achieve maximum efficiency.
As more designs turn to resonant switching, dedicated controller ICs such as
the FAN6300, FSFA2100 or FSFR2100 mentioned in this design note solve
these issues and combine with guidance on topology to help improve
performance and shorten time tomarket.